The fifth-generation CR-V sits on a longer wheelbase than the last car in order to allow a third row of seats, although five-seat models are also available. There are plenty of storage areas in the cabin, in particular, the centre console offers an adaptable amount of space by offering the facility to slide forwards and backwards. The CR-V is significantly longer than both the Volkswagen Tiguan and Peugeot 3008 and only a fraction shorter than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. That makes it one of the largest vehicles in the segment and contributes to the impressive amount of interior space. Compared with these, vehicles the CR-V is both taller and wider than all but the Discovery Sport, again illustrating an impressive level of space efficiency. Occupants of the first and second rows in the CR-V enjoy excellent head and legroom, and a great deal of attention has clearly been paid to maximise comfort and space for passengers.
For example, the transmission tunnel has been made as slim as possible to ensure minimal intrusion into legroom for the rear passenger in the middle seat. Where fitted, the third row of seats are not well suited to adults, as both legroom and headroom are significantly reduced in comparison with the second row. However, they are big enough for children to use on a regular basis. Due to the latest CR-V鈥檚 design, the boot V is fractionally smaller than the previous generation model鈥檚. It still offers a substantial 561 litres, though, which is more than in the Peugeot 3008 but less than in the Volkswagen Tiguan and Land Rover Discovery Sport. An electric tailgate is standard only on the top specification SR models, but the boot itself has a relatively low loading lip for an SUV and a broad opening. Folding the seats is also easy, with a single strap for the third row and convenient levers located in the boot for row two. Honda鈥檚 Magic Seat design means the second row folds flat into the floor automatically too. With an optional tow bar fitted, the Honda CR-V can tow up to 600kg unbraked and 2,000kg on a braked trailer, making it suitable for owners who may occasionally need to pull other vehicles.
Only a very few bios have some sort of numbers in their Bio. Years of experience, No. of books published and Age. While most indicated that they Love testing, very few were clear in their Bio on what type of testing they are keen on. If you can think of any more inferences from these bios, Please add it to comments. Would love to hear your views. Should the testers be responsible for pinponting the cause of Defects ? A tester works fabulously to find an important bug in an application and raises a bug report with lot of excitement and possibly all the details that he could include. The bug is 100% reproducible. After some days, the bug report gets assigned back to him stating that the Developer needs more information. Upon further analysis of the request, the tester figures out that Developer is actually requesting for assistance to help him "pinpoint" the problem in the code. Of course, the Developer is not asking the tester to go through the code but asking more intricate details that are beyond the scope of a bug report (as the bug is 100% reproducible).
The tester is in confused state! He thinks that he provided all the information that was there to be provided and the bug is 100% reproducible, then why on earth would a developer need more Information. Is pinpointing problem a part of test group's job? In my view, in an ideal world, in couple of words- It should be. Let me explain my perspective here. Project teams develop Software to serve the customers. The test teams primarily exist to provide Specialized Services to the overall projects. The extent of Service include 鈥渨hat鈥?and 鈥渉ow鈥?of it and primarily depend upon the overall Testing mission we choose. Generally, one of the common views is to consider testing only as 鈥淒etection鈥?and 鈥淩eporting鈥?of issues. That certainly leaves out pinpointing activity. To simply put, pinpointing a problem is a activity that helps a developer figure out the buggy part of code. It鈥檚 no wrong in treating testing more alongside the 鈥淒etection鈥?and 鈥淩eporting鈥?areas but when we talk about the notion of Service, one of the things that get associated with it is Value generation.
No comments:
Post a Comment