2019 C300 Smartphone Integration

2019 C300 Smartphone Integration

Hello, new here, just got a 2018 C300 4Matic but unfortunately it came without the smartphone integration. I was wondering if any of you guys have been able to either "activate" the software or found a reliable retrofit otherwise? I looked all over the interwebz and it always seems like my car isn't compatible with OBD activators because "android auto/carplay" isn't pre-installed. But what I want to know is, how is my car different from the 2018 models with smartphone integration? Like, isn't it the same Comand system WITH smart phone integration? Why can't a dealer just install it? Last edited by Jean Luis Urena; 05-04-2019 at 08:26 AM. Visit Jean Luis Urena's homepage! I complained to MB Canada that my 2018 C300 didn't come with Android Auto despite the Android Auto site showed that it should support it. I was told it was only available in 2018 C-Class in the USA, not Canada. You're saying your 2018 doesn't have it either?

I complained to MB Canada that my 2018 C300 didn't come with Android Auto despite the Android Auto site showed that it should support it. I was told it was only available in 2018 C-Class in the USA, not Canada. You're saying your 2018 doesn't have it either? Nope. I was under the impression it did (only the 2019 models have it standard). The salesperson also incorrectly told me it did. Ultimately I should've done better homework, but I find it ridiculous that it can't be retrofitted or that it can't be a simple software update. Visit Jean Luis Urena's homepage! 3. Have you tried connecting with SIRI thru the Bluetooth connection - which will give you "some" SIRI control for calling/etc ? 3. Have you tried connecting with SIRI thru the Bluetooth connection - which will give you "some" SIRI control for calling/etc ? Didn't know about this. As for 1, doesn't work with me as I have the datacard that's unsupported. And are you saying smartphone integration was never an option with 2018 C300?

Branch 2. In regards to economy. Objective: Many suggestions have been made towards garnering lions and rp through the completion of specific objectives, accomplishments, damage, and assistance in a given battle. Basically as an aside from kill based earning, you gain through your merit in a battle. Earnings: Some have drawn comparisons through experience in other modes such as ground forces, the way credits are earned doesn't change, meaning that killing a Maus in a pz II doesn't mean you'd earn a million lions. So if a lone dive bomber got a kill on a big BB, it'd earn simply however much that kill was worth. In other words should a lone dive bomber be rewarded with that many lions for a single lucky strike? Surely. It would be no different than ammo racking a tank in ground forces with a single lucky strike. Simplify: The composition of a ship can be simplified into several broadened categories. Such as the engine, ammunition, etc. And if you don't want to ignore crew functions, base them through emulations around each of the defined categories. Branch 3. In regards to Imbalance between the Nations.

NULL: A large portion of people have stated that to deprive the game of a class of ships due to the lack of adequate abilities by one nation to be a moot argument. To ignore all of them simply because the USSR had an inadequate navy has been compared to the state of Japan and its inadequate army tanks. Japan has one of the greatest Navy's in the world and some the greatest aircraft up until their defeat through attrition of their pilots and funding. The USSR had great armored vehicles while Japan did not, Japan had great naval ships while the USSR, for the most part, did not. Time frame: It can be shown that in aircraft and in ground battles, battles between vehicles on varying scales of time already take place, to otherwise change this would be inconsistent with current game meta. Not only this, but quite a few prototype vehicles are already in the game, and have been made to fit where they otherwise perform on-par.